Prosenjit poddar wikipedia
Prosenjit poddar wikipedia.
Prosenjit poddar still alive
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
1976 American case on the duty to protect
| Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California | |
|---|---|
| Full case name | Vitali Tarasoff, et al., Plaintiffs-Petitioners v.
Regents of the University of California, et al., Defendants-Respondents. |
| Citation(s) | 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 |
| Prior history | Appeal from sustained demurrer |
| Psychotherapists have a duty to protect an individual they reasonably believe to be at risk of injury on the basis of a patient's confidential statements. | |
| Chief Justice | Donald Wright |
| Associate Justices | Raymond L.
Sullivan, Marshall F. McComb, Matthew O. Tobriner, William P. Clark, Jr., Stanley Mosk, Frank K. Richardson |
| Majority | Tobriner, joined by Wright, Sullivan, Richardson |
| Concur/dissent | Mosk |
| Dissent | Clark, joined by McComb |
Tarasoff v.
Where is prosenjit poddar now
Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was